An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
The Pentium M (Centrino Mobile Tech.) has great battery life & uses very low power. They are good Laptops, but to buy one right now is a waist of money in my Opinion.
The Athlon 64 Mobile is also an amazing choice, do to the future proof of the 64-Bit technology. I mean, when you buy a Laptop, you want it to last a long time, and the 64-Bit solution rings my bell.
AMD is working on a Athlon 64 Mobile chip which should match or beat Intel's Centrino line of CPU's.
We Shall See.
Last edited by Super XP on Sat Dec 31, 2005 1:05 am; edited 1 time in total
in my opinion...the 64 all the way...but for the normal consumers...centrino is the only way to go...i work at circuit city....and it's so useless trying to explain 64-bit technology to the customers...some haven't even heard of AMD....so even if 64 is better...it's not going to take over the market until intel comes out with it, or amd gets some new ad campaigns going...
Why not type out a great detailed description about Athlon 64 & even give them a link to the AMD Website. Print several of them out, with mild colour(to not waist too much ink) & give them away.
But I know what you mean. Everybody tells me \"Is it a Intel Inside\"
Upsetting you know, hearing that all the time.
AMD needs to do a better job in teaching the industry about 64-Bit technology.
Last edited by Super XP on Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:12 am; edited 1 time in total
Why not type out a great detailed description about Athlon 64 & even give them a link to the AMD Website. Print several of them out, with mild colour(to not waist too much ink) & give them away.
But I know what you mean. Everybody tells me \"Is it a Intel Inside\"
Upsetting you know, hearing that all the time.
AMD needs to do a better job in teaching the industry about 64-Bit technology.
More like AMD needs to better work on their marketing strategy.
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
heh...like ppl will actually read it...we have plenty of brochures explaining stuff, but nobody actually looks at it or anything...SOME ppl follow consumer reports and just want like one of the top 3 rated or something.....
and btw...um isn't the amd 64 mobile already out??? we carry an Averatec and a Compaq that has them...i'm sold a handful of the compaq's, and a few Averatec's since ppl never heard of it before...lol
AMD needs to do a better job in teaching the industry about 64-Bit technology.
If by \"teaching\" you mean \"spreading propaganda\" about, then I suppose so. 64-bit technology shows very little of a performance boost over 32-bit. As This benchmark clearly shows, just about the only thing that significantly benefits from the 64-bit technology is \"Panorama Factory\" and \"POV-Ray.\"
Pentium M all the way.
Last edited by A_Pickle on Sat Nov 19, 2005 6:46 am; edited 1 time in total