An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
Im not too big on benchmarking we all know its a load of bollocks anyway, its only usefull for testing out overclocks even then the stress test in CS:S is quicker and better than aquamark, 3D mark and friends because it gives a closer representation of gaming performance.
I would have to disagree. I think 3Dmark tests are priceless for gaming. Gives me a good idea what direction to go on my over clocks. Also priceless to see how stable my over clock is in 3D gaming.
Thats not the point. All im saying is they are pricless for testing for stable overclocks. But how in gods name do you figure ATI has more power in direct X ? I think your dead wrong. from the Direct X benchmarks in PC wizard 2005 Nvidia pull ahead.
Digg Topic
Tag topic on On del.icio.us
Technorati Search
Post to Slashdot
