An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
Suse and mandriva, i excluded live cds id probably get some more results if i included them. I have used Mandriva when it was mandrake what didnt you like about it kooldrew.
I found it not to bad some spots were still bumpy but that was at least a year and half ago.
Also I hate both Mandriva (tried in the Mandrake days) and Fedora. I have never tried PCLinuxOS, but don't have any intention to anytime soon.
I use PCLinuxOS. It's geared about being user-friendly and stable.
Positives: you don't have to do as much configuration (compared to more popular distributions), the community support is excellent (it's a community driven distribution) and the hardware detection is above average.
Negatives: due to the fact that it's built by a small team, some packages are slightly outdated. Some solutions to problems are still unknown.
It's probably best for people who don't like tinkering with their system.
Edit: PCLinuxOS was also used for the official Amarok LiveCD. This means it's recognised by the Amarok development team:
Quote:
Amarok Live is a LiveCD based on PCLinuxOS, created by Texstar, which itself is a LiveCD distro, mastered with the mklivecd scripts created by Jaco Greeff and currently maintained by Tom Kelly.
Digg Topic
Tag topic on On del.icio.us
Technorati Search
Post to Slashdot
