An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
Yea, today I'll be getting Counter-Strike and World of Warcraft (I finally can meet the system requirements to play at mid-low settings!!) and I'll post what it normally is at.
Yea, today I'll be getting Counter-Strike and World of Warcraft (I finally can meet the system requirements to play at mid-low settings!!) and I'll post what it normally is at.
You won't be at mid settings. With Intel Extreme Graphics with an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ and 512MB ram I couldn't break the 20fps barrier on WoW at almost fully low settings.
Yea, today I'll be getting Counter-Strike and World of Warcraft (I finally can meet the system requirements to play at mid-low settings!!) and I'll post what it normally is at.
You won't be at mid settings. With Intel Extreme Graphics with an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ and 512MB ram I couldn't break the 20fps barrier on WoW at almost fully low settings.
You're using an Athlon 64 with integrated graphics? That's gotta be the biggest bottleneck on your processor.
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
Yea, today I'll be getting Counter-Strike and World of Warcraft (I finally can meet the system requirements to play at mid-low settings!!) and I'll post what it normally is at.
You won't be at mid settings. With Intel Extreme Graphics with an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ and 512MB ram I couldn't break the 20fps barrier on WoW at almost fully low settings.
You're using an Athlon 64 with integrated graphics? That's gotta be the biggest bottleneck on your processor.
Not me (I've got a 9800 Pro :P), it was my grandfather's PC. And timm is correct, I don't believe it was Intel Extreme Graphics now that I think about it. It was something by Intel but not the Extreme.
Yea, today I'll be getting Counter-Strike and World of Warcraft (I finally can meet the system requirements to play at mid-low settings!!) and I'll post what it normally is at.
You won't be at mid settings. With Intel Extreme Graphics with an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ and 512MB ram I couldn't break the 20fps barrier on WoW at almost fully low settings.
You're using an Athlon 64 with integrated graphics? That's gotta be the biggest bottleneck on your processor.
Not me (I've got a 9800 Pro :P), it was my grandfather's PC. And timm is correct, I don't believe it was Intel Extreme Graphics now that I think about it. It was something by Intel but not the Extreme.
Aye. You made me shudder for a sec. ;) The 9800 Pro is still a bit of a bottleneck. I'd suggest a 6600GT.
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
Yea, today I'll be getting Counter-Strike and World of Warcraft (I finally can meet the system requirements to play at mid-low settings!!) and I'll post what it normally is at.
You won't be at mid settings. With Intel Extreme Graphics with an AMD Athlon 64 3500+ and 512MB ram I couldn't break the 20fps barrier on WoW at almost fully low settings.
You're using an Athlon 64 with integrated graphics? That's gotta be the biggest bottleneck on your processor.
Not me (I've got a 9800 Pro :P), it was my grandfather's PC. And timm is correct, I don't believe it was Intel Extreme Graphics now that I think about it. It was something by Intel but not the Extreme.
Aye. You made me shudder for a sec. ;) The 9800 Pro is still a bit of a bottleneck. I'd suggest a 6600GT.
I'm saving up for an upgrade. Problem is I need a new motherboard and PSU to do any major video card upgrade. :P