An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
Well, first off I'm new to this place. I've been secretly browsing it for a while I just haven't had the chance to register. BUT here I am and I have a few little miniscule questions :)
When I built my rig about 2 months ago people were all telling me to get 2x512mb sticks of RAM. Something about it running faster. So I orded that initially. I shocked one of my sticks so it died a week or so later leaving me with just one 512 stick. I was thinking about RMA'ing it, but the time it would have taken was not worth the 30 dollars that I was going to loose, aka, I didn't want my PC unusable for a month. So I sucked it up and stuck with the one 512mb stick until Christmas. I recently got 2 more 512mb sticks putting me at 1.5gb.
That some processors lower the performace of the RAM when upgrading to 4 sticks. SO, would my AMD 64bit Athlon 3500+ Venice Core processor, lower the quality of my RAM once I get my last 512mb stick, or will I be okay?
It would not lower the quality. It would lower the timings to 2T, which really isn't a problem unless you are an overclocker. As a general rule of thumb, it is better not to use 4x512MB sticks, because Athlon 64's in general have issues when using 4 sticks.
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
It would not lower the quality. It would lower the timings to 2T, which really isn't a problem unless you are an overclocker. As a general rule of thumb, it is better not to use 4x512MB sticks, because Athlon 64's in general have issues when using 4 sticks.
Ugh.
So should I stick with the 1.5gigs until I can buy 2x1gb sticks?
I thought KoolDrew said something like Venice cores were fine, but the Winchester that he had in that topic wasn't :/
If the RAM is double-sided you may be forced to run a 2T command rate. However, if you really do need 2GB the advantage of having the extra RAM outweighs running at 2T.
Also, in real-world performance the performance impact won't be large.
Quote:
I thought KoolDrew said something like Venice cores were fine, but the Winchester that he had in that topic wasn't :/
Non-RevE CPU's (e.g. Winchester) were forced to run at 166Mhz @ 2T. The Venice cores can run at 200MHz, but you are still forced to run 2T.
Last edited by KoolDrew on Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:31 am; edited 1 time in total
If the RAM is double-sided you may be forced to run a 2T command rate. However, if you really do need 2GB the advantage of having the extra RAM outweighs running at 2T.
Also, in real-world performance the performance impact won't be large.
Quote:
I thought KoolDrew said something like Venice cores were fine, but the Winchester that he had in that topic wasn't :/
Non-RevE CPU's (e.g. Winchester) were forced to run at 166Mhz @ 2T. The Venice cores can run at 200MHz, but you are still forced to run 2T.
Ah okay.
I'll probably end up getting the 2 gigs but in a year or so when you start needed 3 and 4 gigs, move the 1gig sticks.
i checked out from XS, it can run at DDR500 3-4-4-8 with 2.7v, and i get 2 of them. it actually runs to DDR520 3-4-4-8 @ 2.64v on Dfi Nf4 ultra-D Gskill is the best!!
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
Digg Topic
Tag topic on On del.icio.us
Technorati Search
Post to Slashdot
