An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
The Wall Street Journal recently published an article looking at security on network systems and, more precisely, how to get around it so that the average employee can do the things they want that the network idoesn't allow. Is the tabloid ethos of Murdoch and News Corp. already rubbing off?
Quote:
The Wall Street Journal recently published an article looking at security on network systems and, more precisely, how to get around it so that the average employee can do the things they want that the network idoesn't allow. The publication did soften the blow to corporate IT by asking what risks employees were taking by doing this but somehow forgot to point out the biggest risk of all to the employee: termination. Disregarding the mildly irresponsible approach taken in the article, it is also significantly outdated and assumes that enterprises are employing, and employees are dealing with, what we will call "enterprise network security 1.0." In fact many large enterprises have moved on and are employing new technologies — "enterprise network security 2."' if you will — that make most of the article irrelevant.