An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
Err, why would CPU prices all need to be the same then? To overclock your CPU to 4 or 5GHZ you need some serious HSF, watercooling or even a phase changer. The cost of these things probably amount to the CPU's final stock price at this clock speed.
First of all, that's besides the point. The point is that it doesn't come like that stock, nor does a window on most drives. Secondly, for some Intel procs, you'll only need a regular ol' heatsink to get it to 4GHz.
4GHz doesn't mean much to me when it comes from an Intel processor. I use an Athlon64 running at 2.0Ghz, and I find that it beats my friend's 3Ghz P4 at many things, especially gaming. He has double the amount of RAM I have, too.
Anyway, back on topic.
Last edited by timm on Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:24 am; edited 1 time in total
There will always be stuff like phase-change and watercooling, which won't be used as stock, at least not for many more years. So, we'll able to get a bit more out of all of them.
Yea and i know alot of people that do that, i mean some people are like obsesed with over clocking and stuff cause they want to have the best and most fast and stuff like that.