An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
A recent experiment by 2 Florida researchers shows that Windows Server 2003 is actually more secure than Linux. Amazing, I must say, but I'm not sure this article is completely valid. Red Hat Linux was used. I think better results could have been achieved if something like Fedora was tested. And since we all hate* Windows ( :happy: well everything but Windows 2K Pro), we should turn around and congratulate Mr. Bill Gates. :whistle:
*Note: Only few members here share my opinion. :yawn:
Last edited by Predator on Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
This topic and that article is just sad. Linux is more secure then Windows. Period.
Will thats only Red-Hat and Windows Server 2003, what about the rest. At least something is more secure then Linux
Yes, correct. It is only for a web server.
And to KoolDrew, yes I know the article is sad, but perhaps for web servers, it might be true. Not sure. As I said, it does not necessarily have to be true, it's just something interesting I found on the net.
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
I still believe that 2000 is more secure than XP, excluding SP2. The only major advanced XP has is SP2, which initally had a lot of problems, but no all fixed up.
Last edited by Predator on Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
I still believe that 2000 is more secure than XP, excluding SP2. The only major advanced XP has is SP2, which initally had a lot of problems, but no all fixed up.
The only thing I don't like about SP2 is that it is harder to put the recovery consil on the hard drive...
And for KoolDrew's sake, the old features were improved as well is XP.
Last edited by Nitrous on Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Digg Topic
Tag topic on On del.icio.us
Technorati Search
Post to Slashdot
