An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
Perhaps we should open up a new "Great Debate", in order to further explore the minimum tree-density required by vegetated areas, in order to qualify the area for the status of "forest".
It isnt reliant soley on tree denisty, but forest is merely a term for an area with dense trees (at no point does woodland become a forest), however big, of woodland, the trees and other plants in a large densely wooded area . It is also an ecosystems community of plants and animals that is dominated by trees and other woody plants.
The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, I think, has the definition which is 'land with tree crown cover of more than 10% and area of more than 0.5 ha. Trees should be able to reach a minimum height of 5 metres at maturity', bsically quite dense and not just shrubs.
Quote:
I'm not going to post my photo here - it's already in the staff section - seeing it twice is bad enough.
Digg Topic
Tag topic on On del.icio.us
Technorati Search
Post to Slashdot
