An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
To your question: As of now, most CRT's have faster response times than LCD's. Sure LCD's are lighter and look \"cooler,\" but I rarely attend LAN parties so I am fine with a CRT. Now, there is an LCD out with the fastest response time ever: 4ms from ViewSonic. I wouldn't mind that, but it is quite expensive.
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top
TFT gets my vote... but here's the graph: ....... 1%-^-98% 99% 100% CRT: ---------------------- TFT-: -----------------------
I cant wait for the new OLCD (organic LCD) or LED screens to come out. The LED screens should have all of the greatness of a CRT, minus the size, power consumption, flickering, and weight.
i disagree. From what i have seen a good LCD will put out every bit the speed and quality as a CRT.
*Some* LCD's can outperform CRT's, since NOW, LCD technology has advanced.
Good point, but there is a difference in \"Just Advanced\" & already perfected. The CRT is perfected, or almost perfected. You will get the best image quality with a CRT if you require quick frame rates.
But the LCD, TFT & some others coming out are dominating hands down.
Digg Topic
Tag topic on On del.icio.us
Technorati Search
Post to Slashdot
