An exclusive gaming industry community targeted
to, and designed for Professionals, Businesses
and Students in the sectors and industries
of Gaming, New Media and the Web, all closely
related with it's Business and Industry.
A Rich content driven service including articles,
contributed discussion, news, reviews, networking, downloads,
and debate.
We strive to cater for cultural influencers,
technology decision makers, early adopters and business leaders in the gaming industry.
A medium to share your or contribute your ideas,
experiences, questions and point of view or network
with other colleagues here at iVirtua Community.
I am going to throw this Athlon 64 system away (perhaps in the trash, or maybe I'll melt it and make some money :woot:) and upgrade to an Intel-based PC. :wub: Can someone recommend me some parts for it? I'm looking for a processor in the 200-500$ range.
Last edited by Justin on Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:09 am; edited 1 time in total
Well, then I hear that the Pentium 266MHz is hard core & it's quite cheap :rofl:
Oh, and there is nothing like the amazing Celeron. I mean, Intel virtually took away all of its cache, to sell them cheaper. Now that is what I call brains LOL
Only way it would be an upgrade is if you was upgradeing from a AMD XP or cempron to a 775 ddr 2 system. But a AMD 64 based system still beets even the best 775 intel systems by a great deal.
THose are mobo and procesor, iv seent hat proc do 4.1 onair at sotck voltge, its runs as cool as the northwoods and is cut form the central waffers, most come from costa rica now, but if you get one from malaysia be happy you got the best.
I belive that mobo and the ic7-g are the only 2 equipped with 5 stage power phase regulation needed for the prescott ocing.
Last edited by sin0822 on Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
Well, stay away from an Intel based system. AMD is better, faster, newer & cheaper :rolleyes:
AMD better? How?
Faster? mmm... nah. I'm sure a 7.4ghz intel (overclocked - yes.. 7.4ghz has been reached, and been stable) could outperform any amd.
newer? I don't see how something being newer helps. My pentium 1 is proberbly more reliable than any intel or amd built today, yet it's not newer.. and it's had more uptime and less crashes than a pentium3 and amd athlon I have used. so newer isn't really a factor as far as I am concerned. (But take note that relaibilty isn't all down to the cpu.)
and cheaper.. well than can be discussed. but I would rather get lots for more money. better value.
Anyways, back to the backup system concept.. Do you mean a backup system as in a backup client on your network that can store backups incase of data loss? or a backup system incase you break your other computer(s)?
Last edited by kahrn on Fri Aug 19, 2005 6:22 am; edited 1 time in total
I second that. AMD's CPU is far more superior to anything Intel has to offer to date. Let's just see what the future holds with the Intel/Apple thing :wacko: & the AMD/IBM thing :yes:
Define \"perfectly stable\", because from my definition I have yet to use a perfectly stable cpu ;)
Anyways, it's not all about core speed and such (which is how amd engineers there cpu's)... from my experience two athlons failed within a 3 year period.. I'd say that's pretty shabby considering I'm still waiting for an intel to fail which is almost 10 years old.. :\
One thing for sure is that I won't be using intel or AMD within 3 years if DRM is implemented into both companys chips (which is almost certain as far as I am concerned)
1. Define \"perfectly stable\", because from my definition I have yet to use a perfectly stable cpu ;)
2. Anyways, it's not all about core speed and such (which is how amd engineers there cpu's)... from my experience two athlons failed within a 3 year period.. I'd say that's pretty shabby considering I'm still waiting for an intel to fail which is almost 10 years old.. :\
3. One thing for sure is that I won't be using intel or AMD within 3 years if DRM is implemented into both companys chips (which is almost certain as far as I am concerned)
1. A processor which does not crash the system. Most system crashes are caused by the OS.
2. The original Athlons (not XP) were not very stable. If you are basing your opinion of AMD off of that, then I suggest you try an Athlon XP or Athlon 64.
3. If you are not using AMD or Intel processors, then what will you use? IBM? VIA?
Contributed by Predator, Guest 510 iVirtua Loyalty Points • • • Back to Top